User talk:HitchHikedtoAthlone

Welcome!

Hello, HitchHikedtoAthlone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 13:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HitchHikedtoAthlone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

You have not provided a reason for unblocking. It is also clear that you have used multiple accounts and IP addresses in disruptive ways, over a prolonged period. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HitchHikedtoAthlone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is not clear. I have used only registered accounts to add information. More at bottom of page HitchHikedtoAthlone (talk) 15:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

your block is for abusing multiple accounts. You appear in your unblock request to be conceding the point. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is going on? I merely added a recently signed player and removed verifiability claims at Shamrock Rovers as they are covered by the sources there?? HitchHikedtoAthlone (talk) 17:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Only registered accounts"? What registered accounts? JamesBWatson (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Craig (footballer)

The article Stephen Craig (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC) JMHamo (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Craig (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Craig (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Craig (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 20:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eoin Mullen

The article Eoin Mullen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 20:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barry O'Connor

The article Barry O'Connor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 20:17, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neil Poutch

The article Neil Poutch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 20:19, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]